 |
::01 |
 |
The Canela compare formal friends to godfathers
and godmothers or the godparents of a wedding, relationships
which are common in the interior. There is a special
respect between these men and women, who should be reciprocally
served, honored, and protected. For example, if a baby
accidentally falls into the fire, its principal formal
friend should act out the accident in front of the baby's
parents, with the possibility of burning himself in
the same way. This dramatic act embarasses the parents
in front of the assembled crowd, in such a way that
father and mother will try to prevent the accident from
happening again with their baby.
Formal friends, almost always men, joke amongst
each other when they meet. Each one chooses his formal
friend in the period of initiation of his age class.
In the past they were inseparable. They went to war
together, they protected each other mutually, and on
occasion they exchanged wives.
In relation to naming, a man gives his set of
names to his sister's or classificatory sister's son,
while the woman gives hers to her uterine or classificatory
brother's daughter. Thus, a brother and sister, uterine
or classificatory, name their nephews and nieces of
the same sex. During the 70s, there was a greater exchange
of names between classificatory opposite sex siblings
than between uterine siblings. It makes more sense for
classificatory siblings to proceed in this way, since
this institution narrows the relations between two people.
The uterine siblings already have a strong relationship,
thus the exchange of names doesn't serve to reinforce
it. An alternative form of conduct open to distant cousins
of opposite Sex who call themselves "brothers/sisters"
is to have sexual relations, which makes them classificatory
spouses, consequently breaking that relation. But if,
instead of doing that, they exchange names, they will
become almost as close as uterine siblings.
Along with name transmission goes the cerimonial
rites and access to roles. Among other Timbira and the
northern Gê, name transmission is cerimonially
more important, when the name-giver transmits his cerimonial
persona to the receiver. Among the Canela, however,
name transmission is less evident and significant, both
in cerimonial practices and in the daily life of the
individual. This happens because the presence of the
system of age class moieties is much more notable than
the systems constituted by units based on name transmission.
There are roles that have nothing to do with name transmission;
for example: leaders related to age classes and young
girls associated with initiation rites, wè?tè
girls, visiting intertribal chief, or member of the
group of clowns.
The Apanyekrá had more formal friends
related to the personal name than the Ramkokamekrá,
but they did not have, as the Ramkokamekrá did,
the ritual (intêê) to make new formal friends.
An Apanyekrá person is buried by his/her affines.
Among the Ramkokamekrá, it is the formal friends
who do this.
|